Skip to main content

Table 4 Relative RMSE in percent between field reference data and predicted values

From: Assessing forest inventory information obtained from different inventory approaches and remote sensing data sources

Inventory approach

Remote sensing data sources

V

d g

h L

N

N

spruce

N

pine

N

deciduous

ABA-MV

ALS

9.9

12.1

9.0

37.1

47.5

73.7

133.6

ABA-MV

ALS + CIR

9.9

12.1

9.0

37.4

49.0

74.0

133.6

ABA-MV

ALS + RGBI

9.9

12.1

9.0

37.0

45.3

71.6

133.3

ABA-MV

ALS + Hyper.

9.9

12.1

9.0

37.3

51.8

75.4

103.6

ABA-DD

ALS

14.1

16.2

12.5

33.2

38.6

65.2

140.7

ABA-DD

ALS + CIR

14.2

16.0

12.3

33.2

39.7

65.0

137.9

ABA-DD

ALS + RGBI

14.2

16.3

12.5

32.9

39.8

63.4

134.9

ABA-DD

ALS + Hyper.

14.2

16.3

12.6

32.6

46.5

65.1

118.7

ITC

ALS

33.4

28.0

10.7

62.8

83.2

60.0

121.3

ITC

ALS + CIR

32.6

28.0

10.7

62.8

80.7

61.3

115.3

ITC

ALS + RGBI

33.1

28.0

10.7

62.8

83.5

58.9

105.5

ITC

ALS + Hyper.

32.6

28.0

10.7

62.8

81.9

55.3

102.9

SITC

ALS

28.0

14.3

8.0

26.7

39.3

47.8

144.8

SITC

ALS + CIR

32.5

12.1

7.8

25.9

33.2

45.7

113.5

SITC

ALS + RGBI

28.6

13.6

8.3

30.9

51.5

34.7

110.2

SITC

ALS + Hyper.

36.2

13.9

8.6

27.6

37.7

46.3

123.4

  1. h L Lorey’s mean height, d g mean diameter by basal area, N number of trees, V volume